LIcencia Creative Commons

Licencia Creative Commons
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional.
Showing posts with label VACUNAS COVID-19. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VACUNAS COVID-19. Show all posts

Saturday, December 09, 2023

Malone, McCullough, Kory, Cole, Martin, Kirsch, Yeadon, Dalgleish Join Bridgen In U.K. Parliament (December 4, 2023)

 

 

If men are to wait for liberty till they become wise and good in slavery, they may indeed wait for ever. Thomas Babington Macaulay Essays Contributed to the Edinburgh Review (1843) vol. 1 'Milton'

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, September 22, 2023

JEAN MARC SABATIER: VERITY-FRANCE (22-09-2023-VACUNAS COVID 19 Y SISTEMA RENINA-ANGIOTENSINA))

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

ALEXANDRA HENRION SOBRE EL COVID-19 Y LAS VACUNAS COVID-19

 

 

Henrion, que es Doctora en Genética por la Universidad de París Diderot, fue durante dos décadas directora de Investigación del Instituto Nacional de Salud de Francia (Inserm), después de un posdoctorado en la Escuela de Medicina de Harvard (Boston).

 

P: ¿Cuáles son las diferencias entre ARN natural y el ARN artificial que se usó en las vacunas del COVID?

R: El ARN artificial tiene un idioma genético diferente, y es mucho más resistente a la degradación. Meses después de la inyección de la vacuna lo seguimos viendo en el cuerpo. Y, con la información de la que yo dispongo, no sabemos cuánto tiempo dura en nuestro organismo. 

 

P: Y entonces, ¿por qué se apostó por una vacuna con ARN mensajero para el Covid?

R: Es una buena pregunta. Ni idea, es incomprensible. No tiene sentido. Lo normal después de estar 20 años intentando sacar adelante medicamentos con ARN mensajero sin éxito es que los científicos paren y se pregunten si merece la pena seguir investigando o no. Pero vivimos en un mundo con muchos intereses económicos, y hay inversores que inyectaron mucho dinero, sobre todo en Moderna y en BioNTech. Y quieren que haya una rentabilidad.

Esa podría ser una de las causas. El problema es que se obstinan en insistir en una tecnología que no funciona. Es decir, la tecnología sí funciona, y producir esas proteínas es una proeza técnica y un negocio. Pero luego todo eso no provoca beneficios en la salud.

P: Dice que no se creyó la historia del pangolín y del murciélago como origen del Covid. ¿Cómo cree que surgió entonces?

R: Lo supe por el análisis genético de la secuencia del virus en enero de 2020. Ahí ya se veía claramente que había una lógica de creación humana. Y así es como se crean los virus. Es peligroso. Lo que no entiendo es que ahora, tres años después, la revista Nature diga que la hipótesis del origen animal es casi nula, porque se disponía de esa información desde el principio.

Es difícil de comprender que sabiendo todo esto desde hace mucho tiempo se condenara de forma tan rotunda a las personas que pusieron en duda la teoría del origen animal del virus. Esto ha constituido una censura intracientífica que no tenía fundamento, puesto que no se podían tener certezas. Yo había vivido una falta de interés, por ejemplo, en torno a mi trabajo. Pero nunca he conocido una condena tan rotunda respecto a formular teorías.

P: ¿Considera entonces que ha sido un virus fabricado por el hombre?

R: Para tener la certeza de que es un virus creado por el humano haría falta ver el cuaderno de laboratorio, que posiblemente ya no exista porque se haya destruido. Pero lo que sí es interesante es que se ha visto que hay secuencias que existen en la proteína Spike y en el virus que tienen trazas testimoniales de que han sido patentadas por Moderna en 2017. Cuando se le preguntó al jefe de Moderna cómo era posible que una patente suya estuviera ahí dijo que no lo sabía, y que le preguntaría a los científicos. Y todavía estamos esperando la respuesta.

 

Where is CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG in the Moderna Patent 

 https://thoreaucastellano.blogspot.com/2022/02/where-is-ctcctcggcgggcacgtag-in-moderna_24.html

COMPLEMENTARIEDAD HOMOLOGA DE SARS-CoV-2 y SECUENCIA PATENTADA DE mRNA (II)

 https://thoreaucastellano.blogspot.com/search?q=COMPLEMENTARIEDAD

 

P: Usted alerta de los numerosos peligros de la vacuna, pero no nos están llegando noticias de que se esté produciendo nada fuera de lo común. ¿Se están silenciando los casos de gente afectada?

R: Me sorprende esto, porque en los países escandinavos, en el norte de Europa y en Israel, por ejemplo, se han paralizado las vacunaciones a los jóvenes. En Israel se constató que había un 10% de las mujeres que veían modificado su ciclo menstrual. Y otro ejemplo sería el aumento de los casos de miocarditis en la población joven, algo que llama mucho la atención porque es una enfermedad poco frecuente.

Luego en la calle hay mucha gente que se queja de estar cansada y de tener vértigos y acúfenos. Y hay también casos de cáncer muy muy agresivos, que se desarrollan tan rápido que no da tiempo a aplicar la quimio. De hecho, el ministro de Salud de Alemania se excusó públicamente por las víctimas de la vacuna, porque las cifras que manejan ellos es que hay un caso grave por cada 5.000 vacunados. Y cuando hablamos de casos graves nos referimos a aquellos que cambian la vida del paciente por completo.

Por eso me sorprende que en España no se vea esto con tanta claridad. Puede ser que seáis una excepción. Ojalá, porque eso sería maravilloso.

[Después de responder a esta pregunta, Henrion coge su ordenador. Hace una búsqueda en español, pero se muestra "súper sorprendida" de que "no hay información" en nuestro idioma. "Si buscas en inglés encontrarás muchas noticias en Google pero si escribes en español no hay noticias", comenta. 

 Tras varios minutos de búsqueda, finalmente encuentra una noticia del diario Expansión que dice así: "El riesgo de miocarditis en jóvenes aumenta tras la segunda dosis de la vacuna de ARNm". Y se da por satisfecha, aunque apostilla que, de hecho, "el riesgo aumenta con cada dosis, y se va acumulando", lo que es "un indicio de que la causa puede ser la vacuna".]

MIOCARDITIS Y PERICARDITIS POST-mRNA VACUNAS COVID: SEÑALES DESDE UNA PERSPECTIVA DE FARMACOVIGILANCIA

 https://gruizlegal.blogspot.com/2023/07/miocarditis-y-pericarditis-post-mrna.html

P: ¿Usted se vacunó?

R: Voy a responder de la misma manera que ha respondido el presidente de la República Francesa: es un secreto médico. Y hay que volver a esa idea de que efectivamente, lo es. La salud no tiene que ser motivo de discriminación, ni para acceder a un trabajo, ni para vivir en sociedad.

Me gustaría que mi respuesta fuese una invitación para los demás, para que el resto respondiera de la misma forma que yo y se protejan. Porque además, yo que trabajo con enfermedades genéticas sé hasta qué punto puede afectar la discriminación. A la gente se le estigmatiza y se le pone una etiqueta cuando tiene una enfermedad genética. Se les margina. Y yo estoy muy sensibilizada con el tema.

 

 

https://www.casadellibro.com/libro-los-aprendices-de-brujo/9788413846507/14096217



Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, January 05, 2023

CIENCIAS Y RELIGIONES (MASANORI FUKUSHIMA: LA CIENCIA Y EL CAPITALISMO COMO RELIGIÓN INTRAMUNDANA (II))

CIENCIAS Y RELIGIONES (MASANORI FUKUSHIMA: LA CIENCIA Y EL CAPITALISMO COMO RELIGIÓN INTRAMUNDANA)

 

I  interviewed Professor Fukushima via Zoom on December 28th. He began by giving me some background to his career and explaining why he had become involved in the COVID-19 vaccine issue before moving on to the specific harms, his views of the Japanese Government’s response and the way ahead.

Philip Patrick: Professor Fukushima, thank you for allowing me to speak to you. Could I start by asking you to give me some background to the event on November 25th and how you came to be involved in the COVID-19 vaccine safety issue? 

Masanori Fukushima: I majored [in] biochemistry at Kyoto University post graduate school and actually I am the eldest medical oncologist in our country. I opened in the academic sector the first out-patient clinic for cancer patients in 2003 when I was Professor at Kyoto University. I [became involved in] pharmaco-epidemiology in 2000. This is the study of stop[ping] drug disaster[s]. That’s the mission, the raison d’etre. That’s why I’m involved with the COVID-19 vaccine problem. Because no scientists and only a few physicians have spoken out about the problem of vaccines.

So, when I heard that Government and EU and USA started the messenger RNA program my first impression was this is so stupid. Because messenger RNA is evolutionary, and the cell system is degraded always in a very short time. Messenger RNA is fragile and should be degraded promptly in the body. But this vaccine is modified and manipulated to be stable and to be incorporated in nanoparticles. Nanoparticles are the second problem as it is always incorporating in any type of cells, particularly stem cells. Stem cells are very important for repairing any types of cells. And the third problem is that there is no specificity of delivery. It (messenger RNA) is injected into the body and goes all around the body expressing spike proteins. This is a major problem. The spike protein is very dangerous.

So, when I first heard that the Government was using this vaccine and the PMDA [the Japanese regulatory agency, equivalent to the FDA] had approved it I was very, very concerned, But it has became a kind of religion. Still, they believe in the effectiveness of the vaccine – it’s like a Messiah. 

PP: Why is the spike protein dangerous? 

MF: The spike protein binds to receptor proteins which [are] expressed [in] most cells. So it [the spike protein] attacks all types of cells particularly endothelial cells in the vascular system, which can lead to coagulation. If the endothelial cells bind to the spike protein coagulation is triggered. 

PP: So, we’re talking about heart attacks? 

MF: Yes, if the major artery is affected it can lead to major impacts, such as heart attacks or strokes. And the FDA has detected the signal of the frequency of pulmonary thrombosis. 

PP: And you have written in your reports [published in a Japanese journal] that there have been 2,000 deaths reported to the Government [MHLW] as very likely to have been the result of the vaccine. But in one of your reports, you described it as “the tip of the iceberg”. How much bigger could it be? 

FM: One estimation is five-fold. The reports are mainly from doctors who cared for the patients, but most vaccination is not done in clinics but in vaccination centres run by the prefectures with the injection done by the nurse [so in most cases doctors are not directly involved in the chain of event and unlikely to report vaccine problems].

The cases are accumulating but the Government has denied causality even for the autopsied cases, in which the pathologist has pointed out the causality. There is clear evidence of a significant increase in heart problems and vascular problems such as strokes and pneumonia-like symptoms and others. 

PP: But the argument that people who believe in these vaccines always put forward is that despite a few problems the vaccines are saving far more people than they are damaging. What is your response to that? 

FM: I asked the government to disclose the COVID-19 mortality in vaccinated and non-vaccinated people. This statistic is critical. If there is no difference, then the vaccine induced deaths do not justify the use of the vaccines. I officially requested this information with my attorney on August 1st. And the first answer was “wait two months”. And then the final answer was “no, we do not disclose”. So, the next step is to sue the Government. 

PP: You are planning to sue the Government? 

FM: Yes, based on the Information Disclosure Act. 

PP: So, they are refusing to disclose vital information which the public need to know and which could save lives? 

FM: Yes, that’s right. It’s like a joke. Because the Government disclosed such information last year. And there is evidence that for under 65 year-olds the mortality rate for unvaccinated people is lower than the vaccinated people. It is funny – no, not funny because there are many deaths, so we don’t laugh; but the behaviour of the ministry is very stupid. 

PP: So, they previously disclosed and then stopped disclosing, presumably because it is embarrassing. So, it is impossible to find the information that we need to find out if the vaccines are working or not? At one point in the video you said “it looks like you are hiding data”. 

FM: Yes, and I think they were upset. There are so many deaths. It is an unprecedented vaccine disaster. I can’t imagine how many people have really died. 2,000 is the minimum, the tip of the iceberg. 

PP: And it is all ages, isn’t it? One of your reports had a 28 year-old man who died after the second vaccine with no health problems? 

MF: That’s right, no health problems. Five days after the second vaccine. It’s very tragic. 

PP: Do you think the scale of this is so enormous and the scandal is so big that the government simply cannot accept it? They would prefer to go on and pretend the vaccines work than admit the scale of the disaster? Is that their position? 

MF: So… it’s not an appropriate analogy but you say if you kill one person, [it] is legally murder, but kill so many people and it’s like war and you don’t go to jail. 

PP: Someone once said that the bigger the lie the easier it is to get away with. Why are the Japanese still getting vaccinated? 

MF: But I think the rate is going down. Many people are stopping. And apparently mass media do not encourage vaccination as much as previously. 

PP: So, in the media there is less encouragement, there is nothing on vaccine injuries, but less encouragement to get vaccinated? The message has subtly changed. 

MF: Yes, that’s the Japanese way. But this problem is growing bigger and bigger. One very popular magazine is publishing a series on the vaccine problems. Their influence is very big, so next year a change will occur. 

PP: And three other doctors have come forward (Kojima , Sano and Nagao). What is the feeling among doctors generally? 

MF: Yes, Dr. Nagao has got in touch with me and wants a dialogue. And Professor Sano was with me at the meeting on November 25th. He was on the same table. And there is also Professor Kojima from Nagoya University. Professor Kojima is a very significant person who identified the vaccine problems using very important analysis. 

PP: So, the group is getting bigger? 

MF: Bigger, but I am not [organising it]. I am involved because I was asked to write papers about COVID-19, and one was on how to avoid COVID-19 and deal with COVID-19. I advised appropriate use of steroid therapy without delay. When COVID-19 arrived in Japan for the first time in February 2020 I gathered information from China and concluded that the critical point was to stop the development of interstitial pneumonitis. The answer is to detect the drop in oxygen level in the blood. If it is below 95% then check the CT and if there is an infiltration sign, start the treatment. 

PP: So existing treatments were enough? 

MF: Principally yes, and if you attack the virus with an anti-viral drug it [just] evolves. Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, etc. All viruses evolve through communication with the host. This is a biological principle. 

PP: So, the vaccines are useless? 

MF: Useless. I think so. 

PP: One theory is that interventions such as lockdowns, separating people, closing schools, etc., have influenced the development of the virus, interrupted its natural evolution, possibly causing it to become more transmissible. Would it have been better simply to behave normally, allow the virus to spread, and just treat the sick promptly, as you have described? 

MF: This is quite difficult to give a clear-cut answer [to]. The virus evolution is based on communication with host so we can’t [exactly] predict the evolution of the virus but in general viruses develop to become more symbiotic with the host. At first, I thought COVID-19 would be similar. The mortality rate has decreased and plateaued, and I cannot totally disprove that vaccines have been effective but really, we have to think that doctors have improved their techniques and that the virus has become less toxic. 

PP: So, it’s not justifiable to link reduced mortality to the virus. It’s post hoc ergo proctor hoc reasoning. 

MF: Yes, and one more point – the clinical guidelines for treating COVID-19 is now in its 8th edition. It’s very meticulous and helpful. If the practitioner adheres to it the patient will be more likely to recover. 

PP: A few more medical points. In the recording you said that the Japanese were relatively lightly hit because they had prior immunity perhaps because of previous exposure to coronaviruses? 

MF: Yes, and this finding is very important. There is evidence from doctors at Kanagawa Dental University and they found that non-vaccinated non-infected care givers had high percentage of cross reactive IgA to SARS-Cov2 virus in their saliva. This is very important because if we make a vaccine for such a respiratory disease, we have to make a mucosal or nasal vaccine, not [an] injection, because injections make only IgG, not secretory IgA anti-bodies. Injection type vaccines only produce serum level IgG just blocking the virus in the body. We need to make an oral or nasal vaccine, but it is still difficult. 

PP: Finally, in your reports you said, perhaps particularly the booster shots, are damaging people’s immune systems, opening them up to all kinds of problems? 

MF: Yes, this has been known from the early days of the vaccine, that it may trigger ADE which is when the antibody accelerates cellular infections. And if you are repeatedly dosed this can lead to original antigen sin. The first-generation vaccine was designed to attack the first variant and second Delta. This was already clearly demonstrated by Catherine Reynolds’ report. So, vaccinated people do not produce appropriate anti-bodies for Omicron. The vaccines can shut down the innate immune system due to the first design of the vaccine. 

PP: People are finding that old conditions are coming back because the immune system has been damaged by the vaccine? 

MF: Yes, yes. 

PP: I don’t know if you know Dr. Aseem Malhotra in the U.K. He first defended the vaccines, then his father died, and he is now an articulate and powerful critic of the vaccines. And his position is that they should be stopped immediately – until a thorough analysis of vaccine harms has taken place. Would you agree? 

MF: Yes, of course. Stop immediately. Governments around the world have the data. Release the data. Stop the immunisation and start the scientific discussion. And we need to examine the long-term effects of the mRNA vaccines. The Government should not hide and manipulate the data. 

PP: Thank you professor. And thank you for speaking truth to power. 

Philip Patrick is a freelance journalist based in Tokyo.

 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 05, 2022

CARTA AL GOBIERNO DE REINO UNIDO DE 76 MÉDICOS SOBRE VACUNAS COVID-19 INFANTILES

 

Dr June Raine, CEO MHRA
Professor Lim Wei Shen, Chairman JCVI COVID-19 vaccines sub-committee
Professor Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer
Dr Jenny Harries, CEO, UKHSA
Hon.Sajid Javid, MP, Secretary of State for Health & Social Care

30th June 2022

Dear Dr Raine,

Re: Covid-19 vaccines for 6 months to 4 years age group

We are writing to you urgently concerning the announcement that the FDA has granted an Emergency Use Authorisation for both Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines in preschool children.

We would urge you to consider very carefully the move to vaccinate ever younger and younger children against SARS-CoV-2, despite the gradual but significant reducing virulence of successive variants, the increasing evidence of rapidly waning vaccine efficacy, the increasing concerns over long-term vaccine harms, and the knowledge that the vast majority of this young age group have already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 repeatedly and have demonstrably effective immunity. Thus, the balance of benefit and risk which supported the rollout of mRNA vaccines to the elderly and vulnerable in 2021, is totally inappropriate for small children in 2022. 

(...)

We summarize below the overwhelming arguments against this vaccination.

A.  Extremely low risk from COVID-19 to young children

  • In the whole of 2020 and 2021, not a single child aged 1-9 died where COVID-19 was the sole diagnosis on the death certificate, according to ONS data.

  • A detailed study in England from March 1st 2020 to March 1st 2021 found only six children under 18 years died with no co-morbidities. There were no deaths aged 1-4 years.

  • Children clear the virus more easily than adults.

  • Children mount effective, robust, and sustained immune responses.

  • Since the arrival of the Omicron variant, infections have been generally much milder. That is also true for unvaccinated under-5s.

  • By June 2022 it is now estimated that 89% of 1-4-year-olds had already had SARS-CoV-2 infection.

  • Recent data from Israel show excellent long-lasting immunity following infection in children, especially in 5-11s.

B.  Poor vaccine efficacy 

  • In adults, it has become apparent that vaccine efficacy wanes steadily over time, necessitating boosters at regular intervals. Specifically, vaccine efficacy has waned more rapidly against the latest Omicron variants. 

  • In children, vaccine efficacy has waned more rapidly in 5-11s than in 12-17s, possibly related to the lower dose used in the pediatric formulation. One study from New York showed efficacy against Omicron falling to only 12% by 4-5 weeks and to negative values by 5-6 weeks post second dose.

  • In the Pfizer 0-4s trial, the efficacy after two doses fell to negative values, necessitating a change to the trial protocol. After a third dose there was a suggestion of efficacy from 7-30 days but there is no data beyond 30 days to see how quickly this will wane. 

C. Potential harms of COVID-19 vaccines for children

  • There has been great concern about myocarditis in adolescents and young adults, especially in males after the second dose, estimated at one per 2,600 in active post-marketing surveillance in Hong Kong. The emerging evidence of persistent cardiac abnormalities in adolescents with post-mRNA vaccine myopericarditis, as demonstrated by cardiac MRI at 3-8 months follow up, suggests this is far from ‘mild and short-lived’. The potential for longer term effects requires further study and calls for the strictest application of the precautionary principle in respect of the youngest and most vulnerable children.

  • Although post-vaccination myocarditis appears to be less common in 5-11-year-olds than older children, it is, nonetheless, increased over baseline.

  • In the Pfizer study, 50% of vaccinated children had systemic adverse events, including irritability and fever. Diagnosis of myocarditis is much more difficult in younger children. No troponin levels or ECG studies were documented. Even a vaccinated child in the trial, hospitalized with fever, calf pain and a raised CPK, had no report of D-dimers, anti-platelet antibodies or troponin levels.

  • In Pfizer’s 5-11s post-authorization conditions, it is required to conduct studies looking for myocarditis and is not due to report results until 2027.

  • Of equal concern are, as yet unknown, negative effects on the immune system. In the 0-4s trial, only seven children were described as having “severe” COVID-19 – six vaccinated and one given placebo. Similarly, for the 12 children with recurrent episodes of infection, 10 were vaccinated against only two who received placebo. These are all tiny figures and much too small to rule out any adverse impact such as antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) and other impacts on the immune system.

  • Also unanswered is the question of Original Antigenic Sin. It is of note that in a large Israeli study, those infected after vaccination had poorer cover than those vaccinated after infection. In the Moderna trial, N-antibodies were seen in only 40% of those infected after vaccination, compared with 93% of those infected after placebo.

  • There is evidence of vaccine-induced disruption of both innate and adaptive immune responses. The possibility of developing an impaired immune function would be disastrous for children, who have the most competent innate immunity, which by now has been effectively trained by the circulating virus.

  • Totally unknown is whether there will be any adverse effect on T-cell function leading to an increase in cancers.

  • Also, in terms of reproductive function, limited animal bio-distribution studies showed lipid nanoparticles concentrate in ovaries and testes. Adult sperm donors have showed a reduction in sperm counts particularly of motile sperm, falling by three months post-vaccination and remaining depressed at four to five months.

  • Even for adults, concerns are rising that serious adverse events are in excess of hospitalizations from COVID-19.

D. Informed consent

  • For 5-11s, the JCVI, in recommending a “non-urgent offer” of vaccination, specifically noted the importance of fully informed consent with no coercion.

  • With the low uptake in this age group, the presence of ‘therapy dogs’, advertisements including superhero images and information about child vaccination protecting friends and family all clearly run contrary to the concept of consent, fully informed and freely given.

  • The complete omission of information explaining to the public the different and novel technology used in COVID-19 vaccines compared to standard vaccines, and the failure to inform of the lack of any long-term safety data, borders on misinformation.

  • (...)

  • Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Principal, Institute for

  •   Cancer Vaccines & Immunotherapy (ICVI)

    Prof Anthony Fryer, PhD, FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry, Keele University 

    Professor David Livermore, BSc, PhD, Retired Professor of Medical Microbiology, UEA

    Professor John Fairclough FRCS FFSEM retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon 

    Lord Moonie,  MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former parliamentary under-

      secretary of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine

    Dr Abby Astle, MA(Cantab), MBBChir, GP Principal, GP Trainer, GP Examiner

    Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner

    Dr Alan Black, MBBS, MSc, DipPharmMed, Retired Pharmaceutical Physician

    Dr David Bramble, MBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist

    Dr Emma Brierly, MBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner

    Dr David Cartland, MBChB, BMedSci, General practitioner

    Dr Peter Chan, BM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine

      practitioner 

    Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

    Julie Coffey, MBChB, General Practitioner 

    John Collis, RN, Specialist Nurse Practitioner, retired

    Mr Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant Ophthalmologist

    James Cook, NHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health

    Dr Clare Craig, BMBCh, FRCPath, Pathologist

    Dr David Critchley, BSc, PhD in Pharmacology, 32 years’ experience in Pharmaceutical R&D

    Dr Jonathan Engler, MBChB, LlB (hons), DipPharmMed

    Dr Elizabeth Evans, MA(Cantab), MBBS, DRCOG, Retired Doctor

    Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD, retired Director of Safety Evaluation at Beecham Pharmaceuticals and retired Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery SmithKline Beecham 

    Dr Simon Fox, BSc, BMBCh, FRCP, Consultant in Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine

    Dr Ali Haggett, Mental health community work, 3rd sector, former lecturer in the history of

      medicine 

    David Halpin, MB BS FRCS, Orthopaedic and trauma surgeon (retired)     

    Dr Renée Hoenderkampf, General Practitioner

    Dr Andrew Isaac, MB BCh, Physician, retired

    Dr Steve James, Consultant Intensive Care 

    Dr Keith Johnson, BA, DPhil (Oxon), IP Consultant for Diagnostic Testing

    Dr Rosamond Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

    Dr Tanya Klymenko, PhD, FHEA, FIBMS, Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Sciences

    Dr Charles Lane, MA, DPhil, Molecular Biologist

    Dr Branko Latinkic, BSc, PhD, Molecular Biologist

    Dr Felicity Lillingstone, IMD DHS PhD ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow 

    Dr Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath

    Katherine MacGilchrist, BSc (Hons), MSc, CEO/Systematic Review Director, Epidemica Ltd.

    Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, Consultant physician, retired

    Ahmad K Malik FRCS (Tr & Orth) Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon

    Dr Kulvinder Singh Manik, MBBS, General Practitioner

    Dr Fiona Martindale, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner

    Dr S McBride, BSc(Hons) Medical Microbiology & Immunobiology, MBBCh BAO, MSc in Clinical

      Gerontology, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, FRCP(Edinburgh). NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics

    Mr Ian McDermott, MBBS, MS, FRCS(Tr&Orth), FFSEM(UK), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

    Dr Franziska Meuschel, MD, ND, PhD, LFHom, BSEM, Nutritional, Environmental and Integrated Medicine

    Dr Scott Mitchell, MBChB, MRCS, Emergency Medicine Physician

    Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology

    Dr David Morris, MBChB, MRCP(UK), General Practitioner

    Margaret Moss, MA (Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire

    Dr Alice Murkies, MD FRACGP MBBS, General Practitioner

    Dr Greta Mushet, MBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy

    Dr Sarah Myhill, MBBS, retired GP and Naturopathic Physician

    Dr Rachel Nicholl, PhD, Medical researcher

    Sue Parker Hall, certified transactional analyst (CTA, psychotherapy); MSc (Counselling & 

      Supervision) MBACP (senior accredited practitioner); EMDR practitioner, Psychotherapist

    Dr Christina Peers, MBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Menopause specialist 

    Rev Dr William J U Philip MB ChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow,

      formerly physician specialising in cardiology

    Dr Angharad Powell, MBChB, BSc (hons), DFRSH, DCP (Ireland), DRCOG, DipOccMed, 

     MRCGP, General Practitioner

    Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD. Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology

    Dr Johanna Reilly, MBBS, General Practitioner

    Jessica Righart, MSc, MIBMS, Senior Critical Care Scientist

    Mr Angus Robertson, BSc, MB ChB, FRCSEd (Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

    Dr Jessica Robinson, BSc(Hons), MBBS, MRCPsych, MFHom, Psychiatrist and Integrative

     Medicine Doctor

    Dr Jon Rogers, MB ChB (Bristol), Retired General Practitioner

    Mr James Royle, MBChB, FRCS, MMedEd, Colorectal surgeon 

    Dr Roland Salmon, MB BS, MRCGP, FFPH, Former Director, Communicable Disease

     Surveillance Centre Wales

    Sorrel Scott, Grad Dip Phys, Specialist Physiotherapist in Neurology, 30 years in NHS

    Dr Rohaan Seth, BSc (hons), MBChB (hons), MRCGP, Retired General Practitioner

    Dr Gary Sidley, retired NHS Consultant Clinical Psychologist

    Dr Annabel Smart, MBBS, retired General Practitioner

    Natalie Stephenson, BSc (Hons) Paediatric Audiologist 

    Dr Zenobia Storah, MA (Oxon), Dip Psych, DClinPsy, Senior Clinical Psychologist (Child and

      Adolescent)

    Dr Julian Tompkinson, MBChB MRCGP, General Practitioner GP trainer PCME

    Dr Noel Thomas, MA, MBChB, DCH, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, retired doctor

    Dr Stephen Ting, MB CHB, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Physician

    Dr Livia Tossici-Bolt, PhD, Clinical Scientist

    Dr Carmen Wheatley, DPhil, Orthomolecular Oncology

    Dr Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

    Mr Lasantha Wijesinghe, FRCS, Consultant Vascular Surgeon

    Dr Damian Wilde, PhD (Chartered) Specialist Clinical Psychologist

  • https://childrensunion.org/6-month-to-4-years-covid-vaccines/

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Friday, May 07, 2021

AMERICANOS QUE DICEN LA VERDAD: EL DR. PETER McCULLOUGH Y LAS VACUNAS COVID-19 (II)

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

AMERICANOS QUE DICEN LA VERDAD: EL DR. PETER McCULLOUGH Y LAS VACUNAS COVID-19

 

Highly cited COVID doctor comes to stunning conclusion: Gov’t ‘scrubbing unprecedented numbers’ of injection-related deaths

3,544 deaths and 12,619 serious injuries reported between Dec. 14, 2020 and April 23, 2021


Dr. Peter McCullough, in a 32-minute interview with journalist Alex Newman, said if this were any other vaccine it would have been pulled from the market by now for safety reasons.

McCullough holds the honor of being the most cited medical doctor on COVID-19 treatments at the National Library of Medicine, with more than 600 citations. He has testified before Congress and won numerous awards during his distinguished medical career.

“A typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained deaths, we get a black-box warning, your listeners would see it on TV, saying it may cause death,” McCullough said. “And then at about 50 deaths it’s pulled off the market.”

The U.S. has a precedent for this. In 1976 during the Swine Flu pandemic the U.S. attempted to vaccinate 55 million Americans, but at that point the shot caused about 500 cases of paralysis and 25 deaths.

“The program was killed, at 25 deaths,” McCullough said.

Compare that type of response to the government’s reaction to much higher reported death numbers related to the Moderna and Pfizer shots and the contrast is alarming, McCullough said, especially when the shots have not even been granted full FDA approval and are only being allowed on the market under an Emergency Use Authorization.

Previous studies, including one from Harvard University, estimate that only 1 to 10 percent of all vaccine-related deaths get reported to VAERS. So in all likelihood, there are more people dying than even gets reported, yet the FDA can’t come up with a single death related to the Moderna and Pfizer shots.

As a matter of comparison: There are 20 to 30 deaths reported every year to VAERS related to the flu shot. That’s with 195 million receiving flu shots. Compare that to the COVID shot, which resulted in 2,602 reported deaths through 77 million vaccinations.

That’s a stunningly high ratio of deaths to vaccinations, the highest for any vaccine in U.S. history, and yet no major media outlet has launched an investigation. Independent journalists and researchers such as Alex Newman, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Leo Hohmann have been ruthlessly censored.

“So the U.S. government has made a decision, along with the stakeholders – the CDC, NIH, FDA, Big Pharma, World Health Organization, Gates Foundation – they have made a commitment to mass vaccination as the solution to the COVID pandemic and we are really going to be witness to what’s going to happen in history. We’re sitting on, right now, the biggest number of vaccine deaths, there’s been tens of thousands of hospitalizations, all attributable to the vaccine, and going strong.”

Mainstream outlets have agreed to not allow any news critical of the shots to reach the American people. This corrupt collusion falls under the Trusted News Initiative, a global collaboration signed onto by Big Tech social-media giants and many of its corrupt corporate media “partners.”

The partners signed onto the Trusted News Initiative to date are: Associated Press, AFP; BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, Microsoft, Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post. The New York Times has also participated in the past.

Reporting facts related to the dark side of the experimental mRNA vaccines is considered “dangerous disinformation” by the globalist media elites behind the Trusted News Initiative.

Dr. McCullough describes ‘whitewash of historic proportions‘

“So I think this was effectively a scrubbing, like we’ve seen elsewhere. There is a Trusted News Initiative, which is very important for Americans to understand, this was announced Dec. 10, and this is a coalition of all the major media and government stakeholders in vaccination, where they are not going to allow any negative information about vaccines to get into the popular media because they’re concerned about vaccine hesitancy, that if Americans got any type of fair, balanced coverage on safety events then they simply would not come forward and get the vaccine.”

Confirming a LeoHohmann.com report from earlier this month, McCullough said the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, while it does have issues with blood clots, is actually the safest of the three vaccines now being offered to Americans.

“In my professional opinion, the safest vaccine on the market was the J&J vaccine. And that was pulled for very rare blood-clotting events. We had seven million people vaccinated but the estimates are for the other two vaccines available, the blood-clotting rates are probably 30 times that of J&J, and these others are going strong.”

McCullough suggested that there is an incestuous relationship between the U.S. government and certain elements within Big Pharma, which causes regulators to look the other way when confronted with safety issues.

“A lot of Americans don’t understand how tight these stakeholders are. Keep in mind the NIH [National Institutes of Health] is a co-owner of the Moderna patent, so they have a vested financial interest in keeping these vaccines going,” he said.

McCullough suggested that there is an incestuous relationship between the U.S. government and certain elements within Big Pharma, which causes regulators to look the other way when confronted with safety issues.

“A lot of Americans don’t understand how tight these stakeholders are. Keep in mind the NIH [National Institutes of Health] is a co-owner of the Moderna patent, so they have a vested financial interest in keeping these vaccines going,” he said.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)