El blog pretende publicar, principalmente, traducciones al español de textos y poemas de Henry David Thoreau y referencias a trabajos sobre dicho autor.
The last time the 1 year yield was this high in 2006 US debt was $8.5 trillion as opposed to $32 trillion now going to $36 trillion in the next 2 years. pic.twitter.com/zkPeJnpQ3I
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) May 31, 2023
#JPMorganChase Transferred $347 Billion in Debt Securities Over the Last 3 Years to Inflate Its Capital Using a Controversial Maneuver https://t.co/4ojh3ZhhGU
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) May 31, 2023
This is what SVB did. At 12/31/2022, SVB reflected $91.3 billion of HTM financial instruments, 43.1% of its balance sheet, at amortized cost. Their fair value was only $76.2 billion, or $15.1 billion less than their carrying value
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) May 31, 2023
Un metro de DNA por cromosoma multiplicado por 46
cromosomas que contiene cada célula hacen 46 metros de DNA por célula;
multiplicado por un billón de células que hay en el cuerpo dan un total de 46
billones de metros de DNA en el cuerpo de una persona. La luna está sólo a
200.000 millones de metros de distancia
(Lynn Margulis y Dorion Sagan,
Microcosmos)
THE MIND, INTRACTABLE THING
LA MENTE, COSA INTRATABLE
MARIANNE
MOORE
Imperturbable ante lo que ha sucedido,
No detenida por la derrota aparente,
Tú, grabadora de imágenes, sin miedo
De los que desprecian, de la muerte o el abatimiento
Has calado a la sirena de Zennor,
Hecho irresistible el artificio de la palabra:
Coral, resto naufragado, chico perdido y “campana hundida en el mar”
La cosa más parecida a un rey que tenemos-
Un arte con el que no sé tratar
Unafraid of what’s done,
undeterred by apparent defeat,
you, imagnifico, unafraid
of disparagers, death, dejection,
have out-wiled the Mermaid of Zennor,
made wordcraft irresistible:
reef, wreck, lost lad, and “Sea-foundered bell”—
craft with which I don’t know how to deal.
DNA To Protein - Part 8
Please archive this series for future reference.
As presented in Part 7, the 3 billion bits of information that make up the DNA in each of our cells is approximately 6 feet long. This 6 feet of DNA in each of our cells is folded up and compacted into a… pic.twitter.com/HyOVOkm6y0
— Dr. Doug Corrigan (@ScienceWDrDoug) May 27, 2023
DNA to Protein - Part 9
Please archive this series for future reference.
If you were to take all of the DNA in your body and line it up end-to-end, it would stretch 34 billion miles, which means it would wrap around the earth’s equator approximately 1.2 million times.
— Dr. Doug Corrigan (@ScienceWDrDoug) May 28, 2023
Life Hacks – 2023 edition
1. If government is involved, avoid it 2. If government supports it, reject it 3. If government says it's safe, it's not 4. If government says it's true, it's false 5. If government wants to help, it won't 6. If government says you need it, you don't
Dr. Simon Goddek
@goddeketal
PhD in Biotechnology. Science Journalist. Polyglot. From the Spectrum. CEO @sunfluencer
. Banned from @twitter
at 45k in 2021. Resurrected at X-mas 2022.
DNA to Protein - Part 10
How Do Proteins Fold?
The 25,000 genes across the entire human genome encode the information to create approximately 100,000 different proteins.
Proteins are the complex biological molecules that do most of the work in each one of our cells.… pic.twitter.com/HASihTnhm0
— Dr. Doug Corrigan (@ScienceWDrDoug) May 29, 2023
To understand how amazing this is, a relatively small protein of only 200 amino acids can fold into 10^200 (10 followed by 200 zeros) different combinations. If the protein could attempt a different folding pattern 10 billion times each second, it would take longer than the age of the universe to find the correct shape. Yet, each protein can fold into the correct shape in nanoseconds.
SURELY JOY IS THE CONDITION OF LIFE
#THOREAU
DNA To Protein - Part 11
After proteins are synthesized in the cell, the story is not over for many of them. As discussed in the previous installment, proteins have to fold into the correct three dimensional geometric shape.
MIRAR BAJO LOS PÁRPADOS DEL TIEMPO: Aunque soy lo bastante viejo como para haber descubierto que los sueños de la juventud no son realizados en este estado de existenc...
In a time that breaks in cutting pieces all around, when men, voiceless against thing-ridden men, set themselves on fire, it seems too difficult and rare to think of the life of a man grown whole in the world, at peace and in place. But having thought of it I am beyond the time I might have sold my hands or sold my voice and mind to the arguments of power that go blind against what they would destroy.
Y
yo le dije que la vida de un hombre trata siempre con la permanencia-que
la clase más peligrosa de irresponsabilidad es pensar de tus quehaceres
como transitorios.Esto,de algún modo,es lo que he tratado de preservar
ante mí mismo.Lo que haces sobre la tierra, la tierra lo hace
permanente.
Wendell Berry ( A place on Earth)
POR LA MATANZA DEL CERDO
“Let them stand still for the bullet, and stare the shooter in the eye, let them die while the sound of the shot is in the air, let them die as they fall, let the jugular blood spring hot to the knife, let its freshet be full, let this day begin again the change of hogs into people, not the other way around, for today we celebrate again our lives’ wedding with the world, for by our hunger, by this provisioning, we renew the bond.”
WB
Dejar que esperen quietos la bala,
y miren al que dispara en el ojo,
dejarles que mueran mientras el sonido del disparo permanece en el aire,
dejarles que mueran cuando caen,
dejar que la sangre de la yugular brote caliente al cuchillo
dejar que su caudal se complete,
dejar que este día comience de nuevo la transformación de los cerdos en gente,
y no al revés,
porque hoy celebramos de nuevo la unión de nuestras vidas con el mundo,
porque por nuestra hambre, por esta satisfacción, nosotros renovamos el contrato
(traducción Guillermo Ruiz)
SÉ COMO EL ZORRO QUE SIGUE MÁS CAMINOS QUE LOS NECESARIOS, ALGUNOS EN UNA DIRECCIÓN EQUIVOCADA, PRACTICA LA RESURRECCIÓN https://t.co/B1aowaTh1M
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) May 28, 2023
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) June 7, 2023
SOBRE LA "#SOLIDARIDADORGÁNICA" DE HUMANOS Y CERDOS#GBUENO POR LA MATANZA DEL CERDO dejarles que mueran cuando caen, dejar que la sangre de la yugular brote caliente al cuchillo... dejar que este día comience de nuevo la transformación de los cerdos en gente, y no al revés... https://t.co/7rU8werWnr
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) June 7, 2023
@TFL1728 There are at the present time two great #nations in the world... I allude to the Russians and the Americans. Both of them have grown up unnoticed; and ...they have suddenly placed themselves in the front rank among the nations...#tocqueville#democracyinamericahttps://t.co/N9RRqGOBhr
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) May 27, 2023
“There are at the present time two great nations in the world, which started from different points, but seem to tend towards the same end. I allude to the Russians and the Americans. Both of them have grown up unnoticed; and whilst the attention of mankind was directed elsewhere, they have suddenly placed themselves in the front rank among the nations, and the world learned their existence and their greatness at almost the same time.
All other nations seem to have nearly reached their natural limits, and they have only to maintain their power; but these are still in the act of growth. All the others have stopped, or continue to advance with extreme difficulty; these alone are proceeding with ease and celerity along a path to which no limit can be perceived. The American struggles against the obstacles which nature opposes to him; the adversaries of the Russian are men. The former combats the wilderness and savage life; the latter, civilization with all its arms. The conquests of the American are therefore gained with the ploughshare; those of the Russian by the sword. The Anglo-American relies upon personal interest to accomplish his ends, and gives free scope to the unguided strength and common sense of the people; the Russian centres all the authority of society in a single arm. The principal instrument of the former is freedom; of the latter, servitude. Their starting-point is different, and their courses are not the same; yet each of them seems marked out by the will of Heaven to sway the destinies of half the globe.”
TOCQUEVILLE
DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA
Until the fighting begins, national military strategy developed in
peacetime shapes thinking about warfare and its objectives. Then the
fighting creates a new logic of its own. Strategy is adjusted.
Objectives change. The battle for Bakhmut illustrates this point very
well.
(...)
Surovkin’s performance is reminiscent of another Russian military officer: General Aleksei Antonov.
As the first deputy chief of the Soviet general staff, Surovikin was,
in Western parlance, the director of strategic planning. When Stalin
demanded a new summer offensive in a May 1943 meeting, Antonov, the son
and grandson of imperial Russian army officers, argued for a defensive
strategy. Antonov insisted that Hitler, if allowed, would inevitably
attack the Soviet defenses in the Kursk salient and waste German
resources doing so.
(...)
Stalin, like Hitler, believed that wars were won with offensive action, not defensive operations.
Stalin was unmoved by Soviet losses. Antonov presented his arguments
for the defensive strategy in a climate of fear, knowing that
contradicting Stalin could cost him his life. To the surprise of
Marshals Aleksandr Vasilevsky and Georgy Zhukov, who were present at the
meeting, Stalin relented and approved Antonov’s operational concept.
The rest, as historians say, is history.
If President Putin and his senior military leaders wanted outside
evidence for Surovikin’s strategic success in Bakhmut, a Western
admission appears to provide it: Washington and her European allies seem to think that a frozen conflict—in
which fighting pauses but neither side is victorious, nor does either
side agree that the war is officially over—could be the most politically
palatable long-term outcome for NATO. In other words, Zelensky’s supporters no longer believe in the myth of Ukrainian victory.
The question on everyone’s mind is, what’s next?
(...)
Why not spare the people of Ukraine further bloodletting and negotiate
with Moscow for peace while Ukraine still possesses an army?
Unfortunately, to be effective, diplomacy requires mutual respect, and Washington’s effusive hatred for Russia
makes diplomacy impossible. That hatred is rivaled only by the
arrogance of much of the ruling class, who denigrate Russian military
power largely because U.S. forces have been lucky enough to avoid
conflict with a major power since the Korean War. More sober-minded
leaders in Washington, Paris, Berlin, and other NATO capitols should
urge a different course of action.
Douglas Macgregor, Col. (ret.) is a senior fellow with The American Conservative,
the former advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the Trump
administration, a decorated combat veteran, and the author of five
books.
ENFASIS INSUSTITUIBLE QUE NO AGOTA LA REALIDAD ( ¿EL YO?)
Es
una gran satisfacción hallar que tus
convicciones más antiguas son permanentes. En lo que se refiere a lo esencial,
nunca he tenido que cambiar mi mente. El aspecto del mundo varía de año en año,
como el paisaje tiene diferentes vestimentas, pero encuentro que la verdad es
todavía verdadera, y nunca lamento ningún énfasis que pueda haber inspirado.
HDT
Carta
a H.G.O. Blake, 18 de Agosto de 1857
Agárrate
a lo más simple siempre. Hogar-hogar-hogar
HDT
Carta
a H.G.O. Blake, 27 de Septiembre de 1855
De
los Amigos incluso su muerte nos inspirará tanto como sus vidas. Ellos
dejarán consuelo a los que sufren como los ricos dejan dinero para sufragar los
gastos de sus funerales, y sus memorias serán incrustadas con pensamientos
sublimes y agradables, mientras los monumentos de otros hombres se cubren de
musgo; porque nuestros Amigos no tienen ningún lugar en el camposanto
HDT
(A week in the Concord and Merrimack)
La
alabanza debería ser dicha tan simple y naturalmente como una flor emite su
fragancia.
The Agreement is signed by Ralph Baric on December 12, 2019—19 days before the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission informed the WHO China Country Office of “cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology detected in Wuhan City, https://t.co/lTnrLDFTsfpic.twitter.com/M2epH57LGl
My life more civil is and free
Than any civil polity.
Ye princes keep your realms
And circumscribed power,
Not wide as are my dreams,
Nor rich as is this hour.
What can ye give which I have not?
What can ye take which I have got?
Can ye defend the dangerless?
Can ye inherit nakedness?
To all true wants time’s ear is deaf,
Penurious states lend no relief
Out of their pelf
-But a free soul -thank God-
Can help itself.
Be sure your fate
Doth keep apart its state
—Not linked with any band—
Even the nobles of the land
In tented fields with cloth of gold—
No place doth hold
But is more chivalrous than they are.
And sigheth for a nobler war.
A finer strain its trumpet rings—
A brighter gleam its armor flings.
The life that I aspire to live
No man proposeth me-
No trade upon the street
Wears its emplazonry.
HDT
4 de Julio de 2001+4 de julio de 2015+24 de mayo de 2023
¿INDEPENDENCIA?
Mi vida es más cívica y libre
que cualquier cuerpo político.
Guarda príncipe tus posesiones
y tu poder circunscrito,
no son tan amplios como mis sueños,
ni tan ricos como esta hora.
¿Qué me ofreces que yo no tenga?
¿Qué puedes tomar de lo que tengo?
¿Puedes defender lo que no tiene peligro?
¿Puedes heredar la desnudez?
El oído de los tiempos es sordo a todas la necesidades verdaderas,
los estados estériles no proporcionan ningún alivio con su botín
-pero un alma libre –gracias a Dios-
puede ayudar por sí misma.
Asegúrate de que tu destino
queda aparte de su estado
-no ligado con cualquier banda-
incluso los nobles de la tierra
en campamentos con vestido de oro
no ocuparán en él ningún lugar
porque tiene más señorío que ellos.
Y busca una guerra más noble.
una melodía más hermosa resuena en su trompeta,
un reflejo más brillante irradia su armadura.
La vida a la que aspiro
nadie me la propone-
ningún trato en el comercio público
utiliza su marca.
Few have said it as well as Bob Dylan: "Come you masters of war. You that build all the guns. You that build the death planes. You that build the big bombs. You that hide behind walls. You that hide behind desks. I just want you to know I can see through your masks...Let me ask… pic.twitter.com/XwBTk52TL1
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) May 24, 2023
So, Elon Musk sure shook things up the other day with his interview
on CNBC where he dared to break the Fourth Wall of media when he took a
shot at George Soros comparing him to Magneto from Marvel’s X-Men.
Elon Musk is asked about his Tweet saying George Soros reminds him of Magneto 🤣 pic.twitter.com/4gfsURVGIF
It’s a brutally funny exchange as Musk carefully measures his
response, takes his time and then goes into full pop culture legend mode
invoking Inigo Montoya from The Princess Bride.
That CNBC flak wasn’t confused by this, he’s doing his job. He’s enforcing narrative control.
The choice of Magneto is an astute one, since it implies Soros’ childhood activities during World War II.
And while I appreciate Musk stepping on that third rail of media
conformity, George Soros the philanthropist, I still maintain he’s
closer to Sheev Palpatine than Erik Lehnsherr.
But what Musk really did was to question why media companies should always bow to the whims of their advertisers.
Musk has been subjected to advertiser boycotts since the day he
walked in with the sink. Twitter’s business model needs to change.
Advertising isn’t it. It’s only a part of it. Musk understands it
needs to evolve because Twitter isn’t like legacy media companies.
Not one bit.
WEF Bloodletting
Musk did this after taking real flak from the internet for hiring
World Economic Forum member and top-tier advertising executive Linda
Vaccarino as the new CEO for Twitter.
Now, Vaccarino is a troubling hire but with Musk positioning himself
as Mr. Free Speech in the common square, it may not be as bad as, “See
Mother WEFfer, expect evil to follow,” as the initial Twitter outrage
mob suggested.
I’ve told you for more than a year (November 2021, to be precise) that we are past Peak Davos, meaning Peak WEF. The WEF is now an easy bogeyman to tar someone with the broadest of guilt-by-association brushes.
The reality, however, is that viewed dispassionately, this year’s
World Economic Forum was a mess, a bunch of globalist ghouls and their
retinue of sycophants whistling past their own graveyards wondering where the next big score was coming from.
Top Ghoul Wrangler Soros himself didn’t even show up, preferring
instead to suck the blood of the attendees of this year’s Munich
Security Conference to ensure the trains to World War III would run on
time.
Clubs like the WEF are only as strong as the talent they can keep.
Is Vaccarino evidence of brain drain from the WEF? It’s not ludicrous.
In fact, it’s more likely than she’s some wide-eyed ideologue.
I’m not saying it’s true, I’m saying it’s possible. So, distrust, but verify is your guide here.
The incentives line up nicely.
Musk needs to shore up Twitter’s relationships with advertisers to keep Twitter afloat.
Vaccarino brings instant credibility to the company.
If Musk is thinking in terms of a different kind of ad model, Vaccarino’s hire makes sense.
Talk to the Hand
The corporate orthodoxy imposed on media companies comes not just from retards like Reed Hastings at Netflix but also through the corruption of their boards by Davos generals like Blackrock and Vanguard.
Their real profit comes from exercising power. Sacrificing a quarter
or two of profitability to put the vein tap in deep across the C-Suites
of the S&P 500 and EuroStoxx 50 is hard to quantify on the balance
sheet.
But Musk can say what he wants in public because that itself is a
form of advertising for Twitter and/or Tesla that can’t be yanked by
some ninny like Larry Fink or Alex Soros making a phone call.
He’s on their level and the company is private.
When your business model depends on advertising you’re their bitch.
Musk knows this so you make the calculated move to attack Soros,
becoming a hero to a vast audience spurned by Twitter when Soros, Fink
and the rest of the WEF ran the place
One of the first blogs I wrote here in 2016 was called “The Authenticity Gap.”In
handicapping that election correctly, that Trump would win, I made the
point that despite his obvious deficits, he was far more authentic than
Hillary.
Being comfortable being yourself is what drove Trump’s victory. The
country was desperate for it and the swing voters were Millennials.
Well, guess what? Musk is shoring up his AQ – Authenticity Quotient –
with not only his Millennial fanbois who buy Teslas, but even jaded
Gen-X curmudgeons like me, even if I still spend most of my day in Distrust, But Verify mode.
Pied Piper or not, he has the platform to drive the conversation
where it was never allowed to go before. We can take it from here,
folks.
No, I Said, “Tucker!”
And this brings me to Tucker Carlson, who announced to great fanfare
that he’s bringing his erstwhile news show to Twitter, self-produced.
His two short videos since Fox canceled his show, putting him in contract limbo, have generated ratings that even his record cable ratings couldn’t match.
Advertiser boycotts hit Fox multiple times over things Carlson said
on air. They don’t want the media to speak the truth, they want it, as
Carlson pointed out in his last video, to tell you only the part of the
truth that supports their agenda.
Musk has been subject to this since the day he walked into Twitter with a kitchen sink in his hand.
Every globalist tit-sucker and wannabe-brownshirt, but I repeat
myself, threatened Musk with extinction. The EU threatened to ban
Twitter. The Biden administration began official investigations.
It was all so breathlessly repeated in the compliant media one would
have thought going long smelling salts would have been good investment
advice for every case of the fucking vapors these people had.
Think back to the so-called “Discord Leaks” and the ruinous press
conference with Dept. of Defense Spokesman John Kirby. We had
‘reporters’ openly asking how they could help the DoD suppress information about the war in Ukraine.
As I argued in my blog about this issue,
the media was openly simping for the regime, torching what remained of
its credibility to announce to the world they have joined that team
against us.
Neither the content of these leaks nor the media’s response was
revelatory to anyone with a passing acquaintance with the current state
of politics. No, the noteworthy thing was that they were so willing to
take off the mask so we could all stop pretending they were journalists.
When the media openly asks how they can help … we have crossed into new territory. Why?
Because it’s never been that way before. Yes, we knew the media were court stenographers, people like myself and Kit {Knightly at Off Guardian}
have known this for more than a decade. But to openly torch what’s
left of their credibility to support disinformation to keep the
administration’s secrets is something very very new.
This wasn’t some double-secret 12-D chess maneuver by hyper-competent
game players. This was far more what it looked like on the surface, a
sphincter-clenching moment of raw panic from people whose lies were
outed in pure damage control mode.
So, about that power of the advertisers, again? How do they have any when their platforms and networks have zero credibility?
Who does the CNBC flak dumbstruck by Musk’s Inigo Montoya impression thinks is really in charge here?
And Then the Lights Came On…
It was like that moment in the Pixar classic, UP, where Doug becomes Alpha:
The media is so used to bullying people into submission they don’t
know what to do when it doesn’t work. But, why would you do that? Lose
Money? It’s unthinkable.
Take a step back and see the reversal here. Do you really think Musk
is scared of these quislings when I own the single biggest, and by far,
most powerful communications platform in history?
The answer would be no.
And that reason is simple. Musk’s real heresy wasn’t returning
something closer to free speech to Twitter. It was proving that the
company could operate on 20% of its old budget and one-quarter of its
staff.
That 80% cost reduction didn’t just equate to stabilizing the company, it freed it from the tyranny of the advertiser.
Musk doesn’t need advertising on Twitter the way Twitter
needed advertising before him. The company wasn’t being run as a profit
center measured in dollars.
Twitter was a loss leader for tyrants. The legacy media
conglomerates are their policy makers and the ad executives their
thought policemen.
Carlson can now self-produce a loss-leader for free speech while his lawyers roast Fox’s chesnuts and he, Musk and Trump can:
… build another Mar-a-Lago in their heads living TV-ad free for
months with “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?” the only choice on the
in-house cable feed.
Musk is now turning the entire cost structure of news media on its
head. It was always going to happen, he just ripped the last band-aid
off exposing the rot underneath.
The media companies and their advertising control model worked so
well for so long because it costs billions to run a broadcast network.
The on-air talent, the producers, the studio, cameras, travel, etc. are
expensive folks. FOX’s makeup budget alone is more than my annual
operating costs.
No wonder they just fired Laura Ingraham, too.
Have you seen the 25-54 demo ratings?
The media companies had to depend on the kindness of strangers to even stay in business.
Today most of the distribution has been decentralized, i.e. Twitter
and personal ISP fees. Physical production tools are cheap. Bandwidth
is cheaper. The overhead of running a small broadcast company with a
private subscription model is a far lower percentage of top-line revenue
than any big network.
The legacy media can neither buy your loyalty nor coerce your conformity.
Now shit-posters cum ‘investigative journalists‘
like Brian Krassenstein whose tone deaf defense of Soros is what
prompted all of this have to work that much harder to protect him.
And thanks to Twitter and things like it, the world is your research
department. Now, the best voices, the best talent, spend their time
curating what they see. More time for enjoying life, less time wasted
sucking up to Sith Lords.
That was Tucker Carlson’s real power when he was at Fox. He’s now free of all of those constraints.
If you want to see where Carlson is headed once he’s doing a free show on Twitter, just look to Megyn Kelly.
— The Megyn Kelly Show (@MegynKellyShow) May 17, 2023
That’s where the editorial bias is now, not in the corporate boardrooms.
You are the ultimate arbiter of what you deem valid. Your eyeballs are all that matters. Your consent.
These are only some of the reasons why Musk owns the most powerful media company in the world.
Does he need to pay Tucker Carlson $20+ million to be on his network? No. Carlson pays Musk.
Does Musk need to hire Carlson a production team? No.
A research team? No.
A legal team to fact check everything? No.
The reason why Musk can’t be bought is because Musk doesn’t need the advertisers.
The advertisers need Musk.
Musk knows it. Carlson knows it. The paid influencers know it. Soros knows it.
What Twitter now does, if its algorithm is set to neutrality, is
assist everyone in finding whatever audience they want to attract. The
media companies can’t maintain the purity of the signal or enforce the
groupthink, because they don’t own the means of production anymore.
All they can do is flood the zone with low quality bots.
And the thing that scares them more than anything else is the day
when Musk rolls out the real revenue maker for Twitter. The one where
they can’t bribe us with money or power because neither of those things
buys dignity.
Join my Patreon if you want your father back, you sonofabitch!
Lo más audaz de la vida es que aborrece a la muerte, y despreciables y desesperadas son las religiones que difuminan ese odio.
Las almas de los muertos están en los otros, los que sobreviven, y allí van muriendo del todo lentamente.
Los intentos por mantener vivo el recuerdo de los hombres, en vez de a ellos mismos, son, pese a todo, lo más grande que la humanidad ha hecho hasta ahora.
(Elias Canetti (1905-1994), Apuntes contra la muerte (1942-1948))
1. f. pl. coloq. cosasinútiles, vanas, depocaentidadysustancia.
fuerte cosa
1. f. coloq. cosamolesta, difícilytrabajosa.
poca cosa, o poquita cosa
1. f. coloqs. Personaoanimaldepocacorpulencia. Estácasadaconunapoquitacosadeapenascincuentakilos. U. t. c. adj. Tanpocacosacomoella, yseenfrentóatodos.
2. f. coloqs. cosadepocaimportancia. Hatenidounahemorragia, pocacosa, notepreocupes.
a cosa hecha
1. loc. adv. Conéxitoseguro.
2. loc. adv. Conintención, adrede.
a otra cosa, mariposa
1. expr. coloq. U. paraseñalarelfinaldeunaactividadyladisposiciónoposibilidaddededicarseaotra. Acabamosestetrabajoyaotracosa, mariposa.
Hemos agotado el tiempo de nuestros antepasados. Hemos agotado toda nuestra libertad heredada, como el pollo el albumen en el huevo. Si queremos salvar nuestras vidas debemos luchar por ellas. El descubrimiento es del tipo de hombre que son tus conciudadanos.Prestos adoran el Dinero y en el séptimo día invocan a Dios con fanfarrias de un extremo a otro de la Unión .El otro día oí de alguien orondo y servil llamado obispo, que alabó la “ley y el orden” con la que Burns fue entregado. Me gustaría, antes de sentarme a ninguna mesa, preguntar si hay en ella alguno que se considere o sea considerado obispo. O él o yo deberíamos abandonarla.
#JohnKerry Declares War on #US#Farmers: Gov’t Farm Confiscations ‘Not Off The Table’
From the union of power and secrecy, From the union of government and science, From the union of science and money, From the union of genius and war, The Mad Farmer walks quietly away https://t.co/Gjw2Mh3DFE
— Guillermo Ruiz Zapatero (@ruiz_zapatero) May 19, 2023
