LIcencia Creative Commons

Monday, December 19, 2022

SAM DILLEMANS AND OTHERS AT LEUVEN: GOODBYE TO ALL THAT? (9-12-2022+19-12-2022)

 

Bertrand Russell, who was beyond the age of liability for military service but an ardent pacifist (a rare combination), turned sharply on me one afternoon and said " Tell me, if a company of men of yor regiment were brought along to break a strike of munition makers and the munition makers refused to submitt, would you order the men to fire?" I said: " Yes, if everything else failed. It would be no worse than shooting Germans, really." He was surprised and asked. " Would your men obey you?" "Of course they would", I said; "they loathe munition makers and would be only too glad of a chance to shoot a few. They think that they're all skrim-shankers"."But they realize that the war's all wicked nonsense?" "Yes, as well as I do". He could not undersad my attitude.

(Robert Graves, Goodbye to all that, page 309)




The first world war was a kind of cultural suicide that destroyed Europe’s eminence. Europe’s leaders sleepwalked – in the phrase of historian Christopher Clark – into a conflict which none of them would have entered had they foreseen the world at war’s end in 1918. In the previous decades, they had expressed their rivalries by creating two sets of alliances whose strategies had become linked by their respective schedules for mobilisation. As a result, in 1914, the murder of the Austrian Crown Prince in Sarajevo, Bosnia by a Serb nationalist was allowed to escalate into a general war that began when Germany executed its all-purpose plan to defeat France by attacking neutral Belgium at the other end of Europe.

 

The nations of Europe, insufficiently familiar with how technology had enhanced their respective military forces, proceeded to inflict unprecedented devastation on one another. In August 1916, after two years of war and millions in casualties, the principal combatants in the West (Britain, France and Germany) began to explore prospects for ending the carnage. In the East, rivals Austria and Russia had extended comparable feelers. Because no conceivable compromise could justify the sacrifices already incurred and because no one wanted to convey an impression of weakness, the various leaders hesitated to initiate a formal peace process. Hence they sought American mediation. Explorations by Colonel Edward House, President Woodrow Wilson’s personal emissary, revealed that a peace based on the modified status quo ante was within reach. However, Wilson, while willing and eventually eager to undertake mediation, delayed until after the presidential election in November. By then the British Somme offensive and the German Verdun offensive had added another two million casualties.

 

(...)

 

The Great War went on for two more years and claimed millions more victims, irretrievably damaging Europe’s established equilibrium. Germany and Russia were rent by revolution; the Austro-Hungarian state disappeared from the map. France had been bled white. Britain had sacrificed a significant share of its young generation and of its economic capacities to the requirements of victory. The punitive Treaty of Versailles that ended the war proved far more fragile than the structure it replaced.

 

Does the world today find itself at a comparable turning point in Ukraine as winter imposes a pause on large-scale military operations there?

 

(...)

 

The preferred outcome for some is a Russia rendered impotent by the war. I disagree. For all its propensity to violence, Russia has made decisive contributions to the global equilibrium and to the balance of power for over half a millennium. Its historical role should not be degraded. Russia’s military setbacks have not eliminated its global nuclear reach, enabling it to threaten escalation in Ukraine. Even if this capability is diminished, the dissolution of Russia or destroying its ability for strategic policy could turn its territory encompassing 11 time zones into a contested vacuum. Its competing societies might decide to settle their disputes by violence. Other countries might seek to expand their claims by force. All these dangers would be compounded by the presence of thousands of nuclear weapons which make Russia one of the world’s two largest nuclear powers.

 

(...)

 

 Henry Kissinger

 

 

How to avoid another world war



  “At the end was the european who lost the last two worldwide wars. Should her bear the inverse fate of a mythic character: Saturn devoured by their sons?”

Ernst Jünger

 


 

 


No comments: