LIcencia Creative Commons

Monday, January 08, 2024

LOS AGRICULTORES Y LOS FANTASMAS DE MAO Y STALIN (FARMERS AND THE GHOSTS OF STALIN AND MAO)

 


Therefore, he reasoned (Preobrazhensky), private property and the market should be abolished in the countryside, so that all investible surplus could be squeezed out of it by the government suppressing agricultural prices. Such surplus was then to be shifted to the industrial sector, where the planning authority could make sure that all of it was invested. In the short run, this would suppress living standards, especially for the peasantry, but in the long run it would make everyone better off, because it would maximize investment and therefore the growth potential of the economy.

 

(...)

 

However, in 1928, it all changed. Upon becoming the sole dictator, Stalin filched his rivals' ideas and implemented the strategy advocated by Preobrazhensky. He confiscated land from the kulaks, the rich farmers, and brought the entire countryside under state control through collectivization of agriculture. The lands confiscated from the kulaks were turned into state farms (sovkhoz), while small farmers were forced to join cooperatives or collective farms (kolkhoz), with a nominal share ownership.

 

Stalin did not follow Preobrazhensky's recommendation exactly. Actually, he went rather soft on the countryside and did not squeeze the peasants to the maximum. Instead, he imposed lower-than-subsistence wages on industrial workers, which in turn forced urban women to join the industrial workforce in order to enable their families to survive.

 

    Stalin's strategy had huge costs. Millions of people resisting, or being accused of resisisting, agricultural collectivization ended up in labour camps. There was a collapse in agricultural output, following the dramatic fall in the number of traction animals, partly due to the slaughtering by their owners in anticipation of confiscation and partly due to the shortage of grains to feed them thanks to forced grain shipments to the cities. This agricultural breakdown resulted in the severe famine of 1932—3 in which millions of people perished.

 

The irony is that, without Stalin adopting Preobrazhensky's strategy, the Soviet Union would not have been able to build the industrial base at such a speed that it was able to repel the Nazi invasion on the Eastern Front in the Second World War. Without the Nazi defeat on the Eastern Front, Western Europe would not have been able to beat the Nazis. Thus, ironically, Western Europeans owe their freedom today to an ultra-left-wing Soviet economist called Preobrazhensky.

 

Why am I nattering on about some forgotten Russian Marxist economist from nearly a century ago? It is because there is a striking parallel between Stalin's (or rather Preobrazhensky's) strategy and today's pro-rich policies advocated by free-market economists.

(Ha-Joon Chang: 23 Things they don't tell you about capitalism; pages 138-140)

The Great Leap Famine and Amartya Sen (LA HAMBRUNA DEL GRAN SALTO ADELANTE Y AMARTYA SEN)

The Great Leap Famine and Amartya Sen: Amartya Sen, a Nobel Laureate argues, “in the terrible history of famines in the world, no substantial famine has ever occurred in any independent and democratic country with a relatively free press.”[1] According to Sen, severe famine does not happen if a country is autonomous (independent), fair and accountable (democratic), and encourages free exchange of ideas (free press). Autonomous government has the power to allocate resources according to domestic concerns, and democratic government has duty to accommodate societal concerns guided by the rule of law. Relatively free press allows citizens to express their concerns freely and notifies government with challenges in society. The Great Leap Famine in China could also have been prevented if China at the time was independent, democratic, with a relatively free press, as Sen suggested. The Great Leap Famine was led by three key factors: Mao ignoring precautionary alarm suggested by the political elites; Mao silencing intellectuals from suggesting alternative agricultural-scientific theories; and top leaders of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was not informed about the villagers dying of famine. These could have been easily prevented under the Sen’s conditions because democratic institutionalization allows political elites to freely discuss policies, freedom of expression encourages intellectuals to freely criticize scientific theories, and democratic election and mass media coverage motivates citizens to freely address their concerns.

The infamous Great Leap Famine in 1959 to 1962 is the worst famine in modern Chinese history. The catastrophic famine caused gigantic causalities, estimated from 23 million to 46 million people.A professor from Hong Kong University of Science and technology, James Kaising Kung and a professor from Peking University, Justin Yifu Lin, argues that political radicalism created the Great Leap Famine.2 Ineffective policies were carried out – grain procurement and steel and iron production – while government officials focused on protecting their careers by enforcing unrealistic goals which starved peasants to death.
 
 
   
 

Flesh and blood, body and soul are gone. All is well, and the little fulcrum of truth that could lift the world is lost. As such, history becomes a collection of legends, of lost and imagined stories, that are baseless and unfounded. From this perspective then, how important it is that we can remember, and possess our own memories that are neither revised nor erased. It is the least amount of certainty and evidence that we can provide when we speak a little truth. 

 Memories cannot change the world, but it gives us a genuine heart. 

If there comes another Great Leap Forward someday and people revert to using backyard furnaces, it can at least convince us that sand will not turn into iron, and one mu [a unit of measurement, approximately 667 sqm] of yield will not weigh 100,000 catties. We will at least know that this is the most basic common sense, and not some miracle of consciousness producing matter, or air creating food. If there’s another Cultural Revolution of some sort, we’ll at least be able to guarantee that we will not land our parents in prison or on the guillotine. 

Because of this, I hope that each of you, and all of us who’ve experienced the catastrophic Covid-19 will become people who remember; people who derive memories from memory. 

Writing poems after the Auschwitz concentration camp period was indeed barbaric, but it is even more barbaric if we simply choose to forget it in words, in conversations and in memories—it is indeed much more barbaric and horrifying. 

If we can’t be a whistle-blower like Li Wenliang, then let us at least be someone who hears that whistle. If we can’t speak out loudly, then let us be whisperers. If we can’t be whisperers, then let us be silent people who have memories. Having experienced the start, onslaught, and spread of Covid-19, let us be the people who silently step aside when the crowd unites to sing a victory song after the battle is won—the people who have graves in their hearts, with memories etched in them; the people who remember and can someday pass on these memories to our future generations.

"Air creating food"  stands also for "politicians or policies or corporations or the State" producing food. History shows the catastrofic outcomes of it.

Farmers are a key part of the "little fulcrum of truth".
 
Western elites are seeking today, without any memories and/or insight and under the disguise of climate change concerns (instead of communism), a similar "Great Leap Forward" addressed, as said by German farmer@AnthonyLeeLsvD, to get rid of farmers, their economies and knowledge.



 

 

 

"THE MAD FARMER LIBERATION FRONT": WENDELL BERRY IN GERMANY & EUROPE (8-01-2024)


 

Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front

by Wendell Berry

 

Love the quick profit, the annual raise,

vacation with pay. Want more

of everything ready-made. Be afraid

to know your neighbors and to die.

And you will have a window in your head.

Not even your future will be a mystery

any more. Your mind will be punched in a card

and shut away in a little drawer.

When they want you to buy something

they will call you. When they want you

to die for profit they will let you know.

So, friends, every day do something

that won’t compute. Love the Lord.

Love the world. Work for nothing.

Take all that you have and be poor.

Love someone who does not deserve it.

Denounce the government and embrace

the flag. Hope to live in that free

republic for which it stands.

Give your approval to all you cannot

understand. Praise ignorance, for what man

has not encountered he has not destroyed.

Ask the questions that have no answers.

Invest in the millennium. Plant sequoias.

Say that your main crop is the forest

that you did not plant,

that you will not live to harvest.

Say that the leaves are harvested

when they have rotted into the mold.

Call that profit. Prophesy such returns.

Put your faith in the two inches of humus

that will build under the trees

every thousand years.

Listen to carrion — put your ear

close, and hear the faint chattering

of the songs that are to come.

Expect the end of the world. Laugh.

Laughter is immeasurable. Be joyful

though you have considered all the facts.

So long as women do not go cheap

for power, please women more than men.

Ask yourself: Will this satisfy

a woman satisfied to bear a child?

Will this disturb the sleep

of a woman near to giving birth?

Go with your love to the fields.

Lie easy in the shade. Rest your head

in her lap. Swear allegiance

to what is nighest your thoughts.

As soon as the generals and the politicos

can predict the motions of your mind,

lose it. Leave it as a sign

to mark the false trail, the way

you didn’t go. Be like the fox

who makes more tracks than necessary,

some in the wrong direction.

Practice resurrection.

 

“Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front” from The Country of Marriage, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. 1973. Also published by Counterpoint Press in The Selected Poems of Wendell Berry, 1999; The Mad Farmer Poems, 2008; New Collected Poems, 
 
 
 

Saturday, January 06, 2024

6-01-1948+6-01-2024: ¿MITOLOGÍA? ("UN BRINDIS POR EL SEIS DE ENERO")

6-01-2017: ¿MITOLOGÍA?

 

 



Es el pensamiento salvaje e incivilizadamente libre en Hamlet y la Ilíada, en todas las escrituras y mitología, no aprendido en las escuelas, lo que nos deleita.

HDT(Walking)

Nos destruirán entes abstractos
como el cero absoluto o la velocidad
de la luz.No sirvió jamás de nada
imaginar que eran
enormes voluntades a las que suplicar.
Con cierto aire de mitología
sólo queda la fuerza del amor,
poderosa como la gravedad,
igual de maternal y silenciosa:
hace que sea cálida la luna
-una gélida roca-
si recordamos a alguien al mirarla
(Joan Margarit, Mitología) 

 

(6-01-2019)
 

El 1 de Enero de 2007 tú copiaste el poema de Joseph Brodsky "1 de Enero de 1965".Esta es la versión en español, de la que no puedes citar el traductor (no tienes el libro solo la copia manuscrita del poema):

1 DE ENERO DE 1965

Los Reyes Magos olvidarán tu dirección.
No habrá estrellas sobre tu cabeza.
Acaso sólo el ronco bramido del viento
entiendas como en otros tiempos.
A tus hombros cansados les quitarás la sombra,
cuando apagues la vela, antes de acostarte,
pues el calendario nos promete
más días que velas.

(…)

Y mirando en silencio al techo,
porque el calcetín, claro, está vacío,
comprenderás que la avaricia sólo es garantía
de que eres demasiado viejo.
De que ya es tarde para creer en milagros.
Y alzando tu mirada al cielo,
sentirás de repente que tú mismo
eres un regalo sincero.


Buscas en internet referencias al poema y encuentras la versión inglesa del propio autor con una explicación:



The following poem was written by Joseph Brodsky while in internal exile in Norenskaia, in the Arkhangelsk region of northern Russia. In the Soviet Union, New Year’s celebrations came to be seen as a substitute for Christmas. This translation was found among his paper

(Primera vez aquí el 31 de diciembre de 2014)

 

(6-01-2024)

 HEME aquí bajo el cielo,

bajo el que tengo que ganar dinero.

Viene la claridad que es ilusión,

temor sereno junto a la alegría

recién nacida

de la inocencia de esta noche que entra

por todas las ventanas sin cristales,

de mañana en mañana

y es adivinación y es la visión,

lo que siempre se espera y ahora llega,

está llegando mientras alzo el vaso

y me tiembla la mano, vida a vida,

con milagro y con cielo

donde nada oscurece. Y brindo y brindo.

Bendito sea lo que fue maldito.

Sigo brindando hasta que se abra el día

por esta noche que es la verdadera.

 

Claudio Rodríguez, Casi una leyenda

¿Venderé mis palabras hoy que carezco de 
utilidad, de ingresos, hoy que nadie me fía? 
Necesito dinero para el amor, pobreza 
para amar. Y el precio de un recuerdo, la subasta 
de un vicio, el inventario de un deseo,
dan valor, no virtud, a mis necesidades,
amplio vocabulario a mis torpezas,
licencia a mi caliza
soledad. Porque el dinero, a veces, es el propio
sueño, es la misma
vida. Y su triunfo, su monopolio, da fervor,
cambio, imaginación, quita vejez y abre
ceños y multiplica los amigos,
y alza faldas y es miel
cristalizando luz, calor. No plaga, lepra
como hoy; alegría,
no frivolidad; ley,
no impunidad. ¿Voy a vender, entonces,
estas palabras? Rico de tanta pérdida,
sin maniobras, sin bolsa, aun sin tentación
y aun sin ruina dorada, ¿a qué la madriguera
de estas palabras que si dan aliento
no dan dinero? ¿Prometen pan o armas?
¿O bien, como un balance mal urdido,
intentan ordenar un tiempo de carestía,
dar sentido a una vida: propiedad o desahucio?

CR

DINERO

“Alianza y condena” (1965)

 

Shall I sell my words today in which I have no

utility, income or credit?

I need money to buy love, poverty

to love. And the price of a memoir, the auction

of a vice, the inventory of a desire,

give value, no virtue, to my necessities,

ample vocabulary to my wrongs,

license to my limestone

loneliness.

Because money is, sometimes, our own

dream, life

itsef. And its victory, its monopoly, gives fervor,

change, imagination, erases aging and open

frowns multiplying friends,

uplifting skirts and it is honey

cristallizing light, heat. Not plague, pandemy

like today; joy,

not frivolity; law,

not impunity.

Shall I sell, then

these words? Rich of so much loss,

without tricks, without purse, even without temptation

and any golden ruin, ¿for which purpose the burrow

of these words giving breath

instead of money? ¿Do they promise bread or arms?

or, like an underfunded balance sheet,

try to order a time of scarcity,

provide meaning to a life: self-ownership or eviction?

 

DINERO

“Alianza y condena” (1965)

(traducción Guillermo Ruiz) 

 

 

Friday, January 05, 2024

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM AND DOSTOEVSKI (3-01-2023+6-01-2024)

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM AND DOSTOEVSKI

Thursday, January 04, 2024

TRACTORES EN ALEMANIA (18-12-2023+04-01-2024;ROSE AUSLÄNDER: MUTTERLAND)

ALEMANIA: TRACTORES EN LA PUERTA DE BRANDENBURGO (ROSE AUSLÄNDER: MUTTERLAND)

(18-12-2023)

 

TRACTORES EN ALEMANIA

 

 

 

 

  Choral
Jesu, nimm dich deiner Glieder
ferner in Genaden an;
schenke, was man bitten kann,
zu erquicken deine Brüder:
Gib der ganzen Christenschar
Frieden und ein sel’ges Jahr!
Freude, Freude über Freude!
Christus wehret allem Leide.
Wonne, Wonne über Wonne!
Er ist die Genadensonne.

 

 Chorale
Jesus, continue to look after
Thy members with loving grace;
give, whatever we ask,
to revive Thy brethren:
give to all the Christian throng
peace and a blessèd year!
Joy, joy, unending joy!
Christ shall ward off all sorrow.
Bliss, bliss, unending bliss!
He is the sun of grace.

FARMERS IN GERMANY AND WORLDWIDE ARE NOT DAMAGING ANYTHING REQUIRED FOR HUMAN BEING'S HEALTH AND WEALTH 

WHO DID IT?

Wednesday, January 03, 2024

A WORLD OF FANTASISTS LEAD BY A LAWLESS ELITE

Our most serious problem, perhaps, is that we have become a nation of fantasists ... We have an economy that depends not on the quality and quantity of necessary goods and services, but on the moods of a few stockbrokers. We believe that democratic freedom can be preserved by people ignorant of the history of democracy and indifferent to the responsibilities of freedom.

Our leaders have been for many years as oblivious to the realities and dangers of their time as were George III and Lord North. They believe that the difference between war and peace is still the overriding political difference—when, in fact, the difference has diminished to the point of insignificance. How would you describe the difference between modern war and modern industry—between, say, bombing and strip mining, or between chemical warfare and chemical manufacturing? The difference seems to be only that in war the victimization of humans is directly intentional and in industry it is “accepted” as a “trade-off.”

(…)

Were the catastrophes of Love Canal, Bhopal, Chernobyl, and the Exxon Valdez episodes of war or of peace? They were, in fact, peacetime acts of aggression, intentional to the extent that the risks were known and ignored.

Wendell Berry

UN MUNDO DE FANTASIOSOS LIDERADO POR UNA ÉLITE SIN REGLAS 

fantasioso, sa 

De fantasía 'presunción'. 

1. adj. Que se deja llevar por una imaginación carente de fundamento. U. t. c. s. 

Sin.: soñador, imaginativo, inventivo, creativo, idealista, iluso, fantaseador. 

Ant.: realista, objetivo. 

2. adj. coloq. Vano, presuntuoso. 

Sin.: vano, presuntuoso, fatuo, vanidoso, creído. 

Ant.: sencillo, modesto, humilde. Sinónimos o afines de fantasioso, sa soñador, imaginativo, inventivo, creativo, idealista, iluso, fantaseador. vano, presuntuoso, fatuo, vanidoso, creído. 

Antónimos u opuestos de fantasioso, sa realista, objetivo. sencillo, modesto, humilde. 

La antropóloga Mary Douglas (Los símbolos naturales) atribuye el milenarismo y antiritualismo a los movimientos de rebelión social sin clasificaciones diferenciadoras.

Actualmente son, sin embargo, en el mundo occidental, característicos de las élites no sujetas a reglas: es su vía para sofocar cualquier acceso al control de los símbolos y diferenciaciones traicionados.

Douglas señaló que la "magia es producto del control social" y "constituye así un barómetro de la legitimidad política" (a mayor "magia" menos legitimidad). Lo que no podía imaginar es que pudiera constituir un recurso al servicio de las élites occidentales.

La magia o las magias  de la deuda sin límite, de la pureza ecológica y la energía limpia, de la guerra de liberación, de la salud no individual, de la desinstitucionalización y la renuncia al derecho ...

Este aspecto antropológico sigue a las observaciones de Carl Schmitt sobre las élites políticas:


"YOU MUST THEN KEEP YOUR PACE CLOSE TO THE ELITE'S ONE IN EACH MOMENT.BUT YOU SHOULD HAVE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING:

1) TODAY'S ELITE IS NOT YESTERDAY'S ELITE AND MUCH LESS TOMORROW'S AND THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW ELITE

2) ELITE ARE THOSE WHO PAY LESS TAXES WITH MORE INCOME

3) ELITE ARE THOSE WHO CAN OBLIGE OTHERS TO FULFILL FORMS AND PETITIONS.ELITE ARE THOSE WHO CAN DEMAND INDEMNITIES FROM THEIR VICTIMS

4) ELITE ARE THOSE WHO DO NOT SEEK JUSTICE IN COURTS AND WHO ARE NOT AFRAID OF BEING BROUGHT TO COURT DUE TO THEIR WRONGDOINGS

(EPSTEIN LIST)

5) ELITE ARE THOSE WHO DO NOT NEED TO SEEK PASSPORTS FROM THE POLICE

6) ELITE ARE THOSE WHOSE SOCIOLOGY NO ONE DARES TO WRITE. ELITE ARE THOSE WHO CHARGE OTHERS WITHOUT WORRYING ABOUT BEING CHARGED BY OTHERS

(EPSTEIN LIST)

7) ELITE ARE THOSE WHO CAN RESIST "TU QUOQUE""

(EPSTEIN LIST)

CS

(JULY 22, 1948)