CIENCIAS Y RELIGIONES (MASANORI FUKUSHIMA: LA CIENCIA Y EL CAPITALISMO COMO RELIGIÓN INTRAMUNDANA)
I interviewed Professor Fukushima via Zoom on December 28th. He began
by giving me some background to his career and explaining why he had
become involved in the COVID-19 vaccine issue before moving on to the
specific harms, his views of the Japanese Government’s response and the
way ahead.
Philip Patrick: Professor Fukushima, thank you for
allowing me to speak to you. Could I start by asking you to give me some
background to the event on November 25th and how you came to be
involved in the COVID-19 vaccine safety issue?
Masanori Fukushima: I majored [in] biochemistry at
Kyoto University post graduate school and actually I am the eldest
medical oncologist in our country. I opened in the academic sector the
first out-patient clinic for cancer patients in 2003 when I was
Professor at Kyoto University. I [became involved in]
pharmaco-epidemiology in 2000. This is the study of stop[ping] drug
disaster[s]. That’s the mission, the raison d’etre. That’s why I’m
involved with the COVID-19 vaccine problem. Because no scientists and
only a few physicians have spoken out about the problem of vaccines.
So, when I heard that Government and EU and USA started the messenger
RNA program my first impression was this is so stupid. Because
messenger RNA is evolutionary, and the cell system is degraded always in
a very short time. Messenger RNA is fragile and should be degraded
promptly in the body. But this vaccine is modified and manipulated to be
stable and to be incorporated in nanoparticles. Nanoparticles are the
second problem as it is always incorporating in any type of cells,
particularly stem cells. Stem cells are very important for repairing any
types of cells. And the third problem is that there is no specificity
of delivery. It (messenger RNA) is injected into the body and goes all
around the body expressing spike proteins. This is a major problem. The
spike protein is very dangerous.
So, when I first heard that the Government was using this vaccine and
the PMDA [the Japanese regulatory agency, equivalent to the FDA] had
approved it I was very, very concerned, But it has became a kind of
religion. Still, they believe in the effectiveness of the vaccine – it’s
like a Messiah.
PP: Why is the spike protein dangerous?
MF: The spike protein binds to receptor proteins
which [are] expressed [in] most cells. So it [the spike protein] attacks
all types of cells particularly endothelial cells in the vascular
system, which can lead to coagulation. If the endothelial cells bind to
the spike protein coagulation is triggered.
PP: So, we’re talking about heart attacks?
MF: Yes, if the major artery is affected it can lead
to major impacts, such as heart attacks or strokes. And the FDA has
detected the signal of the frequency of pulmonary thrombosis.
PP: And you have written in your reports [published
in a Japanese journal] that there have been 2,000 deaths reported to the
Government [MHLW] as very likely to have been the result of the
vaccine. But in one of your reports, you described it as “the tip of the
iceberg”. How much bigger could it be?
FM: One estimation is five-fold. The reports are
mainly from doctors who cared for the patients, but most vaccination is
not done in clinics but in vaccination centres run by the prefectures
with the injection done by the nurse [so in most cases doctors are not
directly involved in the chain of event and unlikely to report vaccine
problems].
The cases are accumulating but the Government has denied causality
even for the autopsied cases, in which the pathologist has pointed out
the causality. There is clear evidence of a significant increase in
heart problems and vascular problems such as strokes and pneumonia-like
symptoms and others.
PP: But the argument that people who believe in
these vaccines always put forward is that despite a few problems the
vaccines are saving far more people than they are damaging. What is your
response to that?
FM: I asked the government to disclose the COVID-19
mortality in vaccinated and non-vaccinated people. This statistic is
critical. If there is no difference, then the vaccine induced deaths do
not justify the use of the vaccines. I officially requested this
information with my attorney on August 1st. And the first answer was
“wait two months”. And then the final answer was “no, we do not
disclose”. So, the next step is to sue the Government.
PP: You are planning to sue the Government?
FM: Yes, based on the Information Disclosure Act.
PP: So, they are refusing to disclose vital information which the public need to know and which could save lives?
FM: Yes, that’s right. It’s like a joke. Because the
Government disclosed such information last year. And there is evidence
that for under 65 year-olds the mortality rate for unvaccinated people
is lower than the vaccinated people. It is funny – no, not funny because
there are many deaths, so we don’t laugh; but the behaviour of the
ministry is very stupid.
PP: So, they previously disclosed and then stopped
disclosing, presumably because it is embarrassing. So, it is impossible
to find the information that we need to find out if the vaccines are
working or not? At one point in the video you said “it looks like you
are hiding data”.
FM: Yes, and I think they were upset. There are so
many deaths. It is an unprecedented vaccine disaster. I can’t imagine
how many people have really died. 2,000 is the minimum, the tip of the
iceberg.
PP: And it is all ages, isn’t it? One of your
reports had a 28 year-old man who died after the second vaccine with no
health problems?
MF: That’s right, no health problems. Five days after the second vaccine. It’s very tragic.
PP: Do you think the scale of this is so enormous
and the scandal is so big that the government simply cannot accept it?
They would prefer to go on and pretend the vaccines work than admit the
scale of the disaster? Is that their position?
MF: So… it’s not an appropriate analogy but you say
if you kill one person, [it] is legally murder, but kill so many people
and it’s like war and you don’t go to jail.
PP: Someone once said that the bigger the lie the easier it is to get away with. Why are the Japanese still getting vaccinated?
MF: But I think the rate is going down. Many people
are stopping. And apparently mass media do not encourage vaccination as
much as previously.
PP: So, in the media there is less encouragement,
there is nothing on vaccine injuries, but less encouragement to get
vaccinated? The message has subtly changed.
MF: Yes, that’s the Japanese way. But this problem
is growing bigger and bigger. One very popular magazine is publishing a
series on the vaccine problems. Their influence is very big, so next
year a change will occur.
PP: And three other doctors have come forward (Kojima , Sano and Nagao). What is the feeling among doctors generally?
MF: Yes, Dr. Nagao has got in touch with me and
wants a dialogue. And Professor Sano was with me at the meeting on
November 25th. He was on the same table. And there is also Professor
Kojima from Nagoya University. Professor Kojima is a very significant
person who identified the vaccine problems using very important
analysis.
PP: So, the group is getting bigger?
MF: Bigger, but I am not [organising it]. I am
involved because I was asked to write papers about COVID-19, and one was
on how to avoid COVID-19 and deal with COVID-19. I advised appropriate
use of steroid therapy without delay. When COVID-19 arrived in Japan for
the first time in February 2020 I gathered information from China and
concluded that the critical point was to stop the development of
interstitial pneumonitis. The answer is to detect the drop in oxygen
level in the blood. If it is below 95% then check the CT and if there is
an infiltration sign, start the treatment.
PP: So existing treatments were enough?
MF: Principally yes, and if you attack the virus
with an anti-viral drug it [just] evolves. Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta,
etc. All viruses evolve through communication with the host. This is a
biological principle.
PP: So, the vaccines are useless?
MF: Useless. I think so.
PP: One theory is that interventions such as
lockdowns, separating people, closing schools, etc., have influenced the
development of the virus, interrupted its natural evolution, possibly
causing it to become more transmissible. Would it have been better
simply to behave normally, allow the virus to spread, and just treat the
sick promptly, as you have described?
MF: This is quite difficult to give a clear-cut
answer [to]. The virus evolution is based on communication with host so
we can’t [exactly] predict the evolution of the virus but in general
viruses develop to become more symbiotic with the host. At first, I
thought COVID-19 would be similar. The mortality rate has decreased and
plateaued, and I cannot totally disprove that vaccines have been
effective but really, we have to think that doctors have improved their
techniques and that the virus has become less toxic.
PP: So, it’s not justifiable to link reduced mortality to the virus. It’s post hoc ergo proctor hoc reasoning.
MF: Yes, and one more point – the clinical
guidelines for treating COVID-19 is now in its 8th edition. It’s very
meticulous and helpful. If the practitioner adheres to it the patient
will be more likely to recover.
PP: A few more medical points. In the recording you
said that the Japanese were relatively lightly hit because they had
prior immunity perhaps because of previous exposure to coronaviruses?
MF: Yes, and this finding is very important. There
is evidence from doctors at Kanagawa Dental University and they found
that non-vaccinated non-infected care givers had high percentage of
cross reactive IgA to SARS-Cov2 virus in their saliva. This is very
important because if we make a vaccine for such a respiratory disease,
we have to make a mucosal or nasal vaccine, not [an] injection, because
injections make only IgG, not secretory IgA anti-bodies. Injection type
vaccines only produce serum level IgG just blocking the virus in the
body. We need to make an oral or nasal vaccine, but it is still
difficult.
PP: Finally, in your reports you said, perhaps
particularly the booster shots, are damaging people’s immune systems,
opening them up to all kinds of problems?
MF: Yes, this has been known from the early days of
the vaccine, that it may trigger ADE which is when the antibody
accelerates cellular infections. And if you are repeatedly dosed this
can lead to original antigen sin. The first-generation vaccine was
designed to attack the first variant and second Delta. This was already
clearly demonstrated by Catherine Reynolds’ report. So, vaccinated
people do not produce appropriate anti-bodies for Omicron. The vaccines
can shut down the innate immune system due to the first design of the
vaccine.
PP: People are finding that old conditions are coming back because the immune system has been damaged by the vaccine?
MF: Yes, yes.
PP: I don’t know if you know Dr. Aseem Malhotra in
the U.K. He first defended the vaccines, then his father died, and he is
now an articulate and powerful critic of the vaccines. And his position
is that they should be stopped immediately – until a thorough analysis
of vaccine harms has taken place. Would you agree?
MF: Yes, of course. Stop immediately. Governments
around the world have the data. Release the data. Stop the immunisation
and start the scientific discussion. And we need to examine the
long-term effects of the mRNA vaccines. The Government should not hide
and manipulate the data.
PP: Thank you professor. And thank you for speaking truth to power.
Philip Patrick is a freelance journalist based in Tokyo.
