The German farmers’ protest is a prime example of how to mobilise on a massive scale against government. This story should be headline news in every media outlet, but unsurprisingly, it’s on the margins. We should all be openly supporting the farmers.pic.twitter.com/RQCr8SWFfN
— James Melville (@JamesMelville) January 15, 2024
"All efforts to render politics aesthetic culminate in one thing: war. War and war only can set a goal for mass movements on the largest scale while respecting the traditional property system. This is the political formula for the situation. The technological formula may be stated as follows: Only war makes it possible to mobilize all of today’s technical resources while maintaining the property system. It goes without saying that the Fascist apotheosis of war does not employ such arguments. Still, Marinetti says in his manifesto on the Ethiopian colonial war:” For twenty-seven years we Futurists have rebelled against the branding of war as anti-aesthetic. . . . Accordingly we state: . . . War is beautiful because it establishes man’s dominion over the subjugated machinery by means of gas masks, terrifying megaphones, flame throwers, and small tanks. War is beautiful because it initiates the dreamt-of metallization ofthe human body. War is beautiful because it enriches a flowering meadow with the fiery orchids of machine guns. War is beautiful because it combines the gunfire, the cannonades, the cease-fire, the scents, and the stench of putrefaction into a symphony. War is beautiful because it creates new architecture, like that of the big tanks, the geometrical formation flights, the smoke spirals from burning villages, and many others. . . . Poets and artists of Futurism! . . . remember these principles of an aesthetics of war so that your struggle for a new literature and a new graphic art... may be illumined by them!”
This manifesto has the virtue of clarity. Its formulations deserve to beaccepted by dialecticians. To the latter, the aesthetics of today’s war appears asfollows: If the natural utilization of productive forces is impeded by the property system, the increase in technical devices, in speed, and in the sourcesof energy will press for an unnatural utilization, and this is found in war. The destructiveness of war furnishes proof that society has not been mature enough to incorporate technology as its organ, that technology has not been sufficiently developed to cope with the elemental forces of society. The horrible features of imperialistic warfare are attributable to the discrepancy between the tremendous means of production and their inadequate utilization in the process of production—in other words, to unemployment and the lack of markets.Imperialistic war is a rebellion of technology which collects, in the form of “human material,” the claims to which society has denied its natural material.Instead of draining rivers, society directs a human stream into a bed of trenches;instead of dropping seeds from airplanes, it drops incendiary bombs over cities;and through gas warfare the aura is abolished in a new way.
“Fiat ars—pereat mundus,” says Fascism, and, as Marinetti admits, expects war to supply the artistic gratification of a sense perception that has been changed by technology. This is evidently the consummation of “l’art pourl’art.” Mankind, which in Homer’s time was an object of contemplation for the Olympian gods, now is one for itself. Its self-alienation has reached such a degree that it can experience its own destruction as an aesthetic pleasure of the first order. This is the situation of politics which Fascism is rendering aesthetic.Communism responds by politicizing art"
(WB, The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
In: Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt,
translated by Harry Zohn, from the 1935 essay
New York: Schocken Books, 196)
German farmers -and farmers throughout the world- are today a key part of the "little fulcrum of truth".Their claims are those to which elites are denying its "natural material"
No comments:
Post a Comment